Share from 0:00
0:00
/
Preview

Pascal's Mugging and the Obligation You Can't Put Down

Every small duty feels too risky to drop. A 1654 friendship, a 2007 blog post and a court full of busy courtiers explain why.
Niccolò Antonio Colantonio, File:Colantonio, Jerome in his Study.jpg - Wikimedia Commons. Public domain, via commons.wikimedia.org.
Niccolò Antonio Colantonio, File:Colantonio, Jerome in his Study.jpg - Wikimedia Commons. Public domain, via commons.wikimedia.org.

A small enough chance of a big enough disaster can justify almost any demand, provided nobody checks who chose the numbers. That’s the claim. It’s wrong, and the way it’s wrong is worth seeing.

Take the leaving-gift card going round the office. Sign it, chip in, chase the one colleague who hasn’t. Skip the card and, sure, someone might feel overlooked. Probably not. But the what-if took me two seconds to think up and costs me nothing.

Pascal saw the same machinery in kings. In the Pensées he describes a court as a device for keeping the king occupied, because left alone he would have to think about his own condition. The courtiers weren’t running the king’s day. They were keeping him out of an empty room.

The Sums Say Pay. So Why Do You Feel Robbed?

The mugging is older than its name, and the history is short.

Get 25% off for 1 year

Wednesday’s toolkit has a 10-minute empty-room exercise you can try that same evening: [read Wednesday’s toolkit](#).

Check Who Named The Stakes

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Philosopheasy.