The modern world is a relentless race, a constant striving that depletes many.
We are bombarded with messages urging us to do more, be more, achieve more.
This relentless pressure leads to pervasive exhaustion, a state powerfully explored by philosopher Byung-Chul Han.
The Burnout Society
Byung-Chul Han, a South Korean-born German philosopher, gained widespread attention with his book, The Burnout Society.
The book diagnoses the contemporary condition of widespread exhaustion.
We live in an "achievement society," driven by a relentless pursuit of productivity and self-optimization. 28% of U.S. workers report feeling "often" or "always" burned out at work.
This constant pressure to perform leads to individual burnout and a broader societal malaise.
It affects how we relate to ourselves, to others, and to the world.
The Shift from "You Must" to "You Can"
Han's central thesis revolves around a shift in societal control.
The industrial era's disciplinary society was characterized by external rules and prohibitions ("you must").
The contemporary achievement society is fueled by internal pressure and the mantra of possibility ("you can").
Sigmund Freud's concept of the superego, an internalized authority figure, was central to the older model.
The new model is driven by the "ego-ideal."
This is the image of our own perfected selves, a constant source of self-imposed pressure.
The achievement society runs on ego-ideal positivity, not superego guilt .
This constant striving, fueled by the belief that "anything is possible," ultimately leads to exhaustion and inadequacy.
The Psychic Toll of Achievement
Han vividly portrays the psychic and bodily consequences of this constant striving.
Individuals are trapped in a cycle of self-exploitation, perpetually falling short of their idealized self-image.
The individual becomes "at war with itself".
This internal conflict manifests in depression, anxiety, and emptiness.
Even leisure time becomes contaminated by the pressure to achieve, leading to "weary wakefulness."
The Fetish of Transparency
Han's critique extends beyond individual psychology to encompass broader societal trends.
He focuses on the contemporary obsession with transparency.
This is fueled by social media and the pressure to constantly expose and quantify oneself.
He is wary of revealing personal information.
This culture of exposure diminishes the richness and complexity of human experience.
It reduces individuals to data points, stripping away the opacity and mystery that make us unique.
From Metallurgy to Philosophy
Born in Seoul in 1959, Han's early life was marked by a fascination with science and technology.
He initially studied metallurgy.
His intellectual trajectory took a decisive turn when he moved to Germany at 22.
He transitioned from science to philosophy, literature, and theology.
This shift reflects a deeper engagement with the human condition, a move from the tangible world of "wires and soldering irons" to the abstract realm of thought.
Han has stated “Thinking is also tinkering, and thinking can produce explosions. Thinking is the most dangerous activity, maybe more dangerous than the atomic bomb.”
The Dialectic of Enlightenment
Han's work is deeply rooted in the German philosophical tradition, particularly the Frankfurt School.
He continues their critical examination of modernity.
He explores the "dialectic of Enlightenment," the complex interplay between progress and regression, creation and destruction.
Han offers a contemporary update to this analysis.
He focuses on the specific challenges and contradictions of digital capitalism.
His writing carries a melancholic tone.
He conveys a sense of irreversible loss and the disintegration of traditional life under advanced capitalism.
The Erosion of Experience
Capitalism's reach into all aspects of life is a core problem.
He describes a system of "self-exploitation".
Revolution, in this context, becomes almost unthinkable.
Han's consistent critique raises a crucial question: does his unrelenting negativity itself become a symptom of the very system he criticizes?
Does his focus on loss and degradation mirror the one-dimensional logic of digital capitalism?
Han regularly invokes Walter Benjamin’s distinction between the two senses of experience concentrated in the German words *Erfahrung* and *Erlebnis*.
The Digital Erosion of Meaningful Experience
Digital capitalism reshapes our experience.
It erodes meaningful encounters, replacing them with fleeting, superficial interactions. This has significant implications for art, love, and time.
Genuine experience, or *Erfahrung*, involves encountering the "negative" – that which is fundamentally different from our existing understanding.
This encounter is transformative, often involving discomfort and a challenge to preconceived notions.
This process contains "an element of suffering, of undergoing something." It's crucial for personal growth and understanding.
Art as an "Axe for the Frozen Sea"
Art, in its most potent form, can catalyze *Erfahrung*. It can disrupt our habitual ways of seeing and feeling.
A powerful artwork challenges perspectives, forcing us to confront uncomfortable truths.
This confrontation can be deeply emotional. Many people have emotional breakdowns in front of Mark Rothko's work.
The digitalization of a painting deprives it of its essence.
The Paradox of Lingering
For art to have this transformative effect, it must resist easy consumption. We need an environment that allows for "contemplative lingering."
It creates intimacy. Paradoxically, lingering reveals the artwork's inherent strangeness. The closer we try to grasp it, the more it eludes us.
This is precisely the quality that "Immersive" art experiences destroy.
"Immersive" art shows claim to bring us closer to the art. These immersive art shows achieve the opposite. They annihilate the "temporal gravitation" of the originals.
A painting's meaning is rooted in its fixed composition. Digitalization decomposes this, removing its grounding.
Time, Narrative, and *Erlebnis*
Under digital capitalism, time itself becomes fragmented. It loses its narrative flow, becoming disconnected moments.
This fragmented time precludes *Erfahrung*, which requires duration and continuity. Instead, we have *Erlebnis* – fleeting events that entertain but do not transform.
Erfahrung: Deep, transformative experience.
Erlebnis: Superficial, fleeting sensation.
The core of Han's work is philosophical, addressing metaphysical questions through social and cultural phenomena.
### The Ontological Premises of Digital Culture
Han, much like Martin Heidegger, seeks to uncover the underlying metaphysics of our current culture. He is particularly concerned with how hyper-acceleration affects the relationship between consciousness and the world.
His earlier work was more diverse.
His book What Is Power? (2005) foreshadows his later critique of digital capitalism. It explores a non-coercive form of power that eerily anticipates the "burnout society."
Power is most effective when it appears aligned with our desires.
The Power of Voluntary Surrender
The power of capital in the burnout society isn't about oppression. It's about our voluntary surrender to self-exploitation.
Power is maximized when it doesn't rely on threats.
"Absolute power" blends seamlessly into what goes without saying.
This voluntary surrender is a key characteristic of digital capitalism.
This self-exploitation is a twisted version of the Cartesian "I think, therefore I am." It becomes "I am seen, therefore I am."
The Erosion of Temporality and Social Relations
The accelerated time of digital capitalism undermines "contemplative lingering." Life becomes a discontinuous pile-up of sensations.
This new temporal regime atomizes social relations. Others become interchangeable specks in the sensory overload.
Trust, fidelity, and commitment – all temporal practices – are eroded.
The Agony of Eros and the Loss of Transcendence
This corrosion is particularly evident in love and relationships.
Love requires a willingness to risk the unknown. It's an encounter with radical otherness.
Modern love, fixated on comfort and the known, lacks transcendence. It is a narcissistic projection.
The "Smooth" Aesthetic and the Society of Positivity
Transcendence and transgression are disappearing from art. Contemporary art has become an expression of a "society of positivity".
Smoothness: iPhones, Brazilian waxes, Jeff Koons sculptures.
Commonality: Impervious gloss, lack of negativity or resistance.
Han singles out Jeff Koons, whose work has "no disaster, no injury, no ruptures, also no seams".
The smooth artwork bypasses any resistance, facilitating accelerated consumption.
The smooth artwork facilitates easy and fast consumption.
This flatness extends to a broader crisis in digital capitalism. It is the exhaustion of narrative forms as carriers of social meaning.
Conclusion
Byung-Chul Han's analysis reveals the hidden costs of digital capitalism, primarily the erosion of meaningful narratives and the disintegration of shared experiences. Consumer culture's drive for novelty, coupled with the isolating nature of digital screens, has replaced communal storytelling with individual consumption. This results in a loss of temporal continuity and a diminished sense of community.
Han's work highlights a crucial tension between the "non-time" of the present, characterized by fleeting experiences (*Erlebnis*), and the potential for transformative encounters (*Erfahrung*). He contrasts Eastern and Western philosophical cultures. He uses this comparison to describe differences in city design and human interactions.
The most significant implication is Han's call for a reconsideration of inactivity and contemplation. He hints at a path towards rediscovering meaning, but his almost complete negativity risks undermining the message. His idealization of Eastern philosophy's concept of "emptiness" offers a framework that contrasts starkly, yet productively, with the emptiness of modern consumerism.