Have you ever stopped to consider the very air we breathe? We take it for granted, completely oblivious to its intricate workings, its vital role in sustaining life. Similarly, we often fail to examine the economic air we breathe – money. We use it, we chase it, we build our lives around it, yet how many of us truly understand its nature, its impact on our society? What if the very structure of our money, the fuel of our economic engine, was fundamentally flawed, leading to the stagnation and inequality we see around us?
This is precisely the question that Silvio Gesell, a German-Argentine merchant, posed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. His ideas, radical for their time, offered a stark critique of the conventional monetary system. Today, they remain largely forgotten. But perhaps it's time to dust them off. Because the solutions he proposed, and the extraordinary experiment that tested them, might just hold a key to unlocking a more just and prosperous future.
The Problem of Interest: Money that Breeds Inertia
Gesell's core argument hinged on the nature of interest-bearing money. He believed that the very design of our monetary system, where money naturally *earns* more money through interest, incentivizes hoarding rather than productive activity. This, he argued, leads to an artificial scarcity of money, hindering investment and creating a cycle of economic downturns. Think about it: if money grows simply by sitting in a bank, why invest in risky ventures?
He saw this as a fundamental flaw, leading to an imbalance: those who control the flow of money become wealthier, while the broader economy suffers from a lack of circulation and investment. Sound familiar? It’s a system that, he believed, inevitably favors the already wealthy, deepening the gap between the haves and have-nots. The question then becomes: is our money, designed to multiply passively, working against the very people who use it?
Freigeld: Money Designed to Flow
Gesell's solution was nothing short of revolutionary: a currency designed to *lose* value over time. He called it *Freigeld*, meaning "free money." The concept, also known as demurrage currency, worked on a simple principle: each unit of money would require a small stamp, purchased periodically, to maintain its value. This cost, like a hidden tax, would effectively erode the value of the currency if it wasn't spent or invested.
The idea was to make hoarding unattractive. Instead of sitting on their money, people would be encouraged to spend or invest it, stimulating the economy and generating employment. Gesell believed this would create a more vibrant and equitable economic system. But how could such a radical idea ever be put to the test?
The Wörgl Experiment: A Glimpse of Economic Spring
During the Great Depression, the Austrian town of Wörgl, desperate for a solution to widespread unemployment and economic collapse, decided to put Gesell's ideas into practice. In 1932, under the leadership of Mayor Michael Unterguggenberger, Wörgl began issuing its own demurrage currency. The results were astonishing. You can learn all about it in the video: Silvio Gesell's Forgotten Money: The Wörgl Experiment & Demurrage Currency.
The town quickly experienced a remarkable turnaround. Unemployment vanished, public works projects flourished, and the local economy boomed. The currency circulated rapidly, generating a sense of optimism and enterprise. Here are just a few of the impacts:
Increased spending in the local economy.
Funding of public works projects.
Elimination of local unemployment.
The experiment was a resounding success, a testament to the power of Gesell's vision. But the success was short-lived.
Suppressed by the System: The Fate of Freigeld
The Wörgl experiment, while a local triumph, ran afoul of the central bank, which viewed the demurrage currency as a threat to its control. The experiment was declared illegal and shut down in 1933, effectively silencing a real-world demonstration of an alternative economic model.
The Wörgl experiment showed that a different form of money could offer a path towards a more stable and equitable economy.
Why was such a successful, and beneficial, experiment shut down? Did it pose a threat to the existing financial power structures?
Keynes and the Legacy of Gesell
Interestingly, Gesell's ideas weren’t entirely ignored. The influential economist John Maynard Keynes, a central figure in modern economic thought, was intrigued by Gesell's theories, particularly the concept of demurrage money. Keynes, in his seminal work *The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money*, acknowledged the potential of a currency designed to encourage spending. While Keynes didn’t fully embrace Gesell's vision, his engagement with the ideas hinted at their potency.
Unlock deeper insights with a 10% discount on the annual plan.
Support thoughtful analysis and join a growing community of readers committed to understanding the world through philosophy and reason.
Rethinking Our Economic Foundations
Gesell's ideas challenge us to question the very foundations of our monetary system. Do we truly understand how the money we use every day shapes our lives and our society? Are we trapped in a system that prioritizes hoarding and speculation over investment and the common good? Could a different form of money, like the demurrage currency advocated by Gesell, offer a path toward a more stable and equitable economy?
The Wörgl experiment is a powerful reminder that alternatives exist. It demonstrates that, at a local level, it is possible to create an economy based on different principles. While Gesell's ideas are complex, the basic concept is simple: a money designed to encourage circulation and investment rather than stagnation and hoarding. The legacy of Silvio Gesell and the Wörgl experiment encourages us to keep questioning, exploring, and considering the potential of a more equitable monetary system. What do you think?
Thanks for bringing up Gesell. I hope you will follow up with a more in-depth article on some of the spinoffs from the Wörgl experiment, especially Social Credit, which was widely championed in Great Britain and the US and actually put in place sucessfully in some Canadian provinces until, like Gesell's model, shut down by the feds.