The Peace That Could Happen (But Won't): Understanding the Path Not Taken

In the labyrinth of Middle Eastern politics, few voices have been as consistently analytical and provocative as Noam Chomsky's. For decades, he has argued that a workable peace between Israelis and Palestinians isn't just possible—it's been tantalizingly within reach, repeatedly brushed by fingertips before slipping away into the abyss of missed opportunities.

The International Consensus

The framework for peace has existed for decades, supported by an overwhelming international consensus: a two-state solution based on pre-1967 borders, with minor and mutually agreed-upon land swaps. This solution, as Chomsky has repeatedly emphasized, has been supported by:

• The majority of the world's nations

• Multiple UN resolutions

• The Arab League (through the Arab Peace Initiative)

• The Organization of Islamic Cooperation

• Significant portions of both Israeli and Palestinian populations

The Path Not Chosen

What makes this situation particularly tragic, in Chomsky's analysis, is that the broad outlines of a peaceful resolution have been clear since the 1970s:

1. Two sovereign states existing side by side

2. Security guarantees for all parties

3. Regional cooperation for economic development

4. A just resolution to the refugee question

5. A shared Jerusalem, serving as capital for both states

The Obstacles to Peace

Yet, as Chomsky argues, several fundamental obstacles continue to block this path:

Power Asymmetry

The dramatic imbalance of power between the parties means that without external pressure, there's little incentive for the stronger party to make significant concessions. This power differential affects everything from water rights to security arrangements.

Settlement Expansion

The continuous expansion of settlements in the occupied territories creates "facts on the ground" that make a viable Palestinian state increasingly difficult to achieve. Each new housing unit, road, and infrastructure project further fragments Palestinian territory.

Strategic Interests

Regional and global powers often prioritize their strategic interests over peace:

• Access to resources

• Military positioning

• Regional influence

• Domestic political considerations

The Role of Public Narrative

The conflict isn't just fought on the ground but in the realm of public perception. Competing narratives about history, justice, and security shape both policy and possibility.

The United States: The Missing Peace Broker

Chomsky has consistently highlighted the crucial role of the United States in this equation. As Israel's primary ally and aid provider, the U.S. holds unique leverage that could be used to advance peace. However, as Chomsky argues, U.S. policy has often:

1. Provided unconditional support rather than constructive pressure

2. Vetoed UN resolutions seeking balanced solutions

3. Funded policies that complicate peace prospects

4. Maintained military aid without humanitarian conditions

The Human Cost of Inaction

While diplomatic solutions remain unused, the human toll continues to mount:

• Civilian casualties on both sides

• Psychological trauma spanning generations

• Economic stagnation and poverty

• Environmental degradation

• Cultural and historical loss

• Deteriorating democratic institutions

The Peace That Could Be

Drawing from Chomsky's analysis, a realistic peace would require:

Immediate Steps:

• Freeze on settlement expansion

• Easing of movement restrictions

• Humanitarian aid access

• Cease-fire mechanisms

Medium-Term Measures:

• Economic cooperation frameworks

• Water-sharing agreements

• Security coordination

• Educational initiatives

Long-Term Solutions:

• Border definitions

• Resource allocation

• Refugee rights

• Jerusalem's status

Why It Won't Happen (Yet)

Chomsky's pessimism about immediate prospects for peace stems from his recognition of entrenched interests:

• Political leaders benefiting from conflict

• Economic interests in occupation

• Ideological commitments

• Regional power dynamics

• Domestic political constraints

Beyond Despair: The Role of Civil Society

Despite the seemingly intractable nature of the conflict, Chomsky points to rays of hope:

1. Growing international awareness

2. Cross-border civilian cooperation

3. Youth movements for peace

4. Alternative media perspectives

5. Cultural exchange initiatives

The Way Forward

While the peace that could happen likely won't in the immediate future, understanding why it won't is crucial for eventually making it possible. Chomsky's analysis suggests several key actions:

1. Supporting grassroots peace initiatives

2. Challenging misleading narratives

3. Promoting human rights documentation

4. Encouraging international law enforcement

5. Fostering people-to-people connections

Conclusion: The Cost of Knowledge

Understanding that peace is possible but being prevented makes the current situation more tragic but also more changeable. As Chomsky reminds us, what humans have created, humans can change.

The peace that could happen may not come tomorrow, but acknowledging its possibility—and understanding the forces preventing it—is the first step toward eventually making it reality. The question isn't whether peace is possible, but whether we're willing to confront the forces that prevent it.

---

This analysis draws from Noam Chomsky's extensive work on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including his books, lectures, and interviews spanning several decades of observation and analysis.