Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Linosan's avatar

I like the point you are making but i am wondering if this is also applicable for people who are directly targeted by totalitarian regimes. It feels to me more like a luxury to „simply“ have this internal exile rather than openly challenging and fighting the oppressive system. And this luxury is only available for few people (e.g. white middle-class). And if those people who can afford this inner exile resort to only building inner resistance and not using their energy to loudly externally rebel and fight against the oppression then the responsibility of that fight will remain with marginalized and directly oppressed groups who are in greater risk of actually becoming martyrs.

What I am saying is, while I like the concept of the inner exile I think this article should mention that this might not be available / applicable to everyone and therefore can be only one form of resistance that should not lead to white people being comfortable doing nothing about oppressive structures.

Peter Jansen's avatar

A vital manual for Cognitive Survival. While the collective demands total transparency, the Internal Exile recognizes that Privacy is a Thermodynamic Shield. By performing the necessary social rituals (Outward Compliance), we minimize Systemic Friction to protect the only domain that matters: the "Forest Passage" of the mind. Essential reading for the unprogrammable.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?